Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - 3.14159

Pages: 1
National Political Opinion / Re: homosexuals win with fascism
« on: June 02, 2014, 04:59:19 AM »
How did the republican party help homosexuals?

Better get your facts straight.  The Democrat party as it has evolved over the last 50 ( or even 80 years, FDR was a socialist/communist, that's why he got along with Uncle Joe Stalin so well) years is much closer to being of the same ilk as the National Socialist German Workers' Party.  Nazi's are a socialist government, ergo left wing, not conservative, ergo right wing.  Although for my money the two parties are really no different anymore.  the idiots at the top of the GOP keep trying to be socialist light. 

Local News / Re: Ryan's Closing
« on: November 15, 2013, 03:29:18 PM »
The parent company of the restaurant chain Ryan's, has filed for bankruptcy and announced the closure of many of its locations.

Buffets, Inc. announced this week it will enter Chapter 11 bankruptcy. As part of the restructuring, Buffets says they will close 81 "underperforming" locations throughout the country.

The company operates several restaurants in the Chattanooga area under its Ryan's brand

Local News / Re: City of Waynesville sued for alleged cover-up
« on: May 19, 2013, 03:05:56 PM »
Mark, for the love of pete quit.

When the dirt is raining back down on your head the hole is deep enough.

  :shame: Talk about posting from Faux News 

Sneak Peek Sheriff's View / Re: THE SHERIFF’S VIEW #8
« on: March 04, 2013, 04:34:41 PM »
I hate to beat a death horse. I understand the long term savings of purchasing new vehicles but you have not answer the question.
Where did the money came from for the initial purchase of the vehicles? Are they paid off or monthly payments?
The last sheriff apparently didnt have the money but now you do?

Asked and answered many times, go back to this thread that this following quote is from.   This started with the previous Sheriff
Quote from: Gene Newkirk on February 13, 2013, 10:14:33 PM
JB helped me on this months ago. The avg car right now cost 4500-4900 dollars a year to keep on the road. The new ones will pay back in 4 years on fuel and maintenance. So this was team work by all three of us.

   Thanks for this post Gene. Folks it took some time to wade through the very complex lease and option plans that Ford and Dodge have for police vehicles to determine the best fit for the $$$$ we could project for the future. One killer feature (and I mean good feature) that Ford has was the provision that if the $$$$ of the government enity dropped in the following years due to circumstance there was a no cost, return the cars, contract is terminated clause. Which made Ford a win-win for us. Not to mention all five cars we are going to order will be snow capable besides fuel efficient.


you dont get it either.   Rape is not the key word here.  "some women are so unjustifiably afraid "   AFRAID is the key word.

NO you don't get it.  RAPE is the key word. Of course they are afraid, who wouldn't be.  Putting that unjustifiably in there is beyond wrong.

no he said  some women are so unjustifiably afraid of being raped that they are liable to  start shooting wildly. HUGE Difference.

Are you saying that there is a justifiable reason to be raped? You're worse than Akin, and you had time think to type it, it wasn't a stupid spur of the moment comment during an interview.

What if the President wrote an EO that you are only allowed to travel a Maximum of 200 miles a month in order to conserve energy and reduce Carbon footprint and global warming?
Those are all "good things" right.  You don't NEED to drive farther than that, Right?  This type o f thing has be done before by other Presidents, right?
Would you be alright with that?
/There is no Bill of Rights guarantee to drive a car.

Sneak Peek Sheriff's View / Re: Sheriff Ron Longs first article.
« on: January 18, 2013, 07:56:24 PM »
I would be most interested in that information as well

Funny,..... I question if you know what a dictator is, and how they come to power.

National Political Opinion / Re: Finally.
« on: January 15, 2013, 10:57:20 PM »
To bad the 2nd amendment doesnt stipulate the process involved to get guns. So unless he outright bans them hes in the clear.  He could also outlaw ammunition and be in the clear.  As far as violating 2nd amendment rights, dont they already do that to felons?

The 2nd might not but the SCOTUS sure did

 On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in Heller v. District of Columbia.[3][4] The Court of Appeals had struck down provisions of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 as unconstitutional, determined that handguns are "arms" for the purposes of the Second Amendment, found that the District of Columbia's regulations act was an unconstitutional banning, and struck down the portion of the regulations act that requires all firearms including rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock." "Prior to this decision the Firearms Control Regulation Act of 1975 also restricted residents from owning handguns except for those registered prior to 1975."[5
The Supreme Court held:
[43][/sup](1) The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.(a) The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.(b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28.(c) The Court’s interpretation is confirmed by analogous arms-bearing rights in state constitutions that preceded and immediately followed the Second Amendment. Pp. 28–30.(d) The Second Amendment’s drafting history, while of dubious interpretive worth, reveals three state Second Amendment proposals that unequivocally referred to an individual right to bear arms. Pp. 30–32.(e) Interpretation of the Second Amendment by scholars, courts and legislators, from immediately after its ratification through the late 19th century also supports the Court’s conclusion. Pp. 32–47.(f) None of the Court’s precedents forecloses the Court’s interpretation. Neither United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 , nor Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252 , refutes the individual-rights interpretation. United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174 , does not limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes. Pp. 47–54.(2) Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.(3) The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment. The District’s total ban on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense. Under any of the standards of scrutiny the Court has applied to enumerated constitutional rights, this prohibition – in the place where the importance of the lawful defense of self, family, and property is most acute – would fail constitutional muster. Similarly, the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional. Because Heller conceded at oral argument that the D. C. licensing law is permissible if it is not enforced arbitrarily and capriciously, the Court assumes that a license will satisfy his prayer for relief and does not address the licensing requirement. Assuming he is not disqualified from exercising Second Amendment rights, the District must permit Heller to register his handgun and must issue him a license to carry it in the home. Pp. 56–64.The Opinion of the Court, delivered by Justice Scalia, was joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. and by Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr.[44][/sup]

Sneak Peek Sheriff's View / Re: Sheriff Ron Longs first article.
« on: January 14, 2013, 11:07:01 PM »
Thank you Sheriff Long
I look forward to your tenure as Pulaski County Sheriff.  I see your tenure as having the potential to out shine Sheriff King's.  Not because you necessarily will be a better Sheriff but because you will be as good a Sheriff, standing on the shoulders of everything Sheriff King has already done for us.
Thank you Sheriff King for providing Sheriff Long with such a platform to start from.

Eagerly awaiting Sheriff Long's first Sheriff's View report, and the like.

  "I have a buddy who is a mechanic and a gun nut. The other night I went into his garage and took all of his wrenches. The next day I took my car in and asked if he could take a look at it. He told me he couldn't really do anything because someone took all his wrenches. I said that's ridiculous, wrenches don't fix cars; people do." ~ From Praggie, Charles Michael.

That's right. Tools are tools. And they can no more fix that car by themselves than a gun can shoot someone by itself.  A Gun is a tool, and you liberal tools are trying to take away the tools I use to protect my family.

   I agree %100 with fish...I think there might be a lil blue flowing thru those veins yet  fish  :th_thicon_super:  ...i am voting no for the fact i dont think a sin tax is something anyone should have to deal with.   Beer and Tobacco should not be picked on like they have been.   I think they need to at least start picking on champange, cavier and cuban cigars to even things out ....until that time screw em

Really Hmm?
 Missouri Rep. Chris Kelly, a Columbia Democrat who sponsored the measure
Kelly, who served in the Legislature in the 1980s and '90s before leaving to become a judge, only to come back to the House four years ago, thinks Leone is just blowing smoke.
"This, according to opponents, is a socialist, job-killing proposal," he said. "When Woody Guthrie drove over the Oklahoma line, the last socialist left that state. With their ($1.03) tax, they have done just fine. We would also still be lower than Arkansas, Illinois and Iowa. This is mythology

National Political Opinion / Re: Anothjer GOP Moron
« on: October 26, 2012, 08:14:16 PM »
Well, while you're merrily calling half this country morons, do you think you could take the time to fix the spelling in your thread title?
Glass, stones   Kettle, Pot

Assault in the third degree.     565.070. 1.  A person commits the crime of assault in the third degree if:     (1)  The person attempts to cause or recklessly causes physical injury to another person; or     (2)  With criminal negligence the person causes physical injury to another person by means of a deadly weapon; or     (3)  The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury; or     (4)  The person recklessly engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death or serious physical injury to another person; or     (5)  The person knowingly causes physical contact with another person knowing the other person will regard the contact as offensive or provocative; or     (6)  The person knowingly causes physical contact with an incapacitated person, as defined in section 475.010, which a reasonable person, who is not incapacitated, would consider offensive or provocative.
The young lady felt threatened.


 The Chicago Annenberg Challenge was created ostensibly to improve Chicago's public schools. The funding came from a national education initiative by Ambassador Walter Annenberg. In early 1995, Mr. Obama was appointed the first chairman of the board, which handled fiscal matters. Mr. Ayers co-chaired the foundation's other key body, the "Collaborative," which shaped education policy.

Factcheck . org
A project of the Chicago Annenberg public policy center
Oddly enough the group that states that the two had nothing really to do with each other is the group that they helped create together,  Hmmmm that's odd isn't it?

Religion Opinion / Re: Seems to Be Reasonable
« on: September 13, 2012, 08:01:49 PM »
We don't see other Christian pastors praising the actions of this one pastor.  We don't see examples of Westboro type Christians in every other Christian Nation.
We haven't seen any Westboro Christians hanging any Muslims off of bridges/ dragging their bodies through the streets.  No Westboro Christians have made a film of decapitating an innocent victim.
Are Westboro Christians hateful horrible people? darn straight they are.  But I can go say that straight to thier face without fear of being sodomized by an AK-47.

National News / Re: Don't Speak Out Against the Administration
« on: August 23, 2012, 02:12:16 AM »
First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak out for me.

County Government Opinion / Re: 2012 Sheriff's Office Election
« on: August 04, 2012, 02:33:19 PM »
Lets just hope it is Bill Anderson that wins the democrat primary and not JT
then vote for the republican that wins there primary whom ever that will be JMO

I plan on taking a democrat primary ballot and voting for Anderson, as an attempt at a first line of defense against JT Roberts.  Then I will vote for Burgess, Long, or Pappas in the regular election.

National Political Opinion / Re: The Memo
« on: August 03, 2012, 01:05:15 AM »
Yes, I could name a few.  You spend too much internet time on right wing conspiracy sites.
Believing everything found there is a sign poor judgement.

You spend too much time at the Pravda site

National Political Opinion / Re: a fitting welcome for nobama
« on: July 08, 2012, 11:51:40 PM »
You know Maynard, just by what you said, I'll bet that is a doctored up photo.  His people wouldn't let anybody that close to his bus and not protection around, because as you said somebody could do something like that.  I don't believe this is a real picture.
It's a shop
Look how close he is supposed to be and look how far away the trees between them have to be

Some people just don't seem to learn. Someway this revolving door syndrome needs to come to an end. His crimes just seems to be more and more. NO MORE PROBATION FOR THIS PERSON. I will start the petition!!!!!!!!!!

We changed the sheriff, we changed the Prosecutor.  NOW its time to change the JUDGES.

Things that make you go HMMMM / Re: Kinda Creepy
« on: February 06, 2012, 05:37:51 PM »
I don't see anything..

But it sees you  :th_thmuwahaha-1:

National Political Opinion / Re: Indefinite Detention!
« on: December 13, 2011, 09:52:41 PM »

Pages: 1