Shoutbox

Refresh History
  • littlebit: Makes sense.
    July 16, 2017, 04:40:28 AM
  • Lepard LLC: Boards will stay open for a place people can find history information longer. I am not allowing anyone to sign up for now because of so many foreginers just wanting to promote their business..
    December 10, 2016, 05:10:27 AM
  • Lepard LLC: Not sure why didn't look, I may be shutting down these message boards..
    November 17, 2016, 12:42:43 AM
  • ~kathy~: rick why is the timestamp showing up a day in advance?
    September 13, 2016, 12:27:46 AM
  • Valor7: What I tried to say is that the actual money would not be there that quick. But a loan against that would work if they are willing to do that.
    August 08, 2016, 01:51:51 PM
  • Lepard LLC: Why so long before it comes online? 911 took out a loan or bond with the known guarantee payment and began building..
    August 08, 2016, 07:46:34 AM
  • Valor7: Actually no it is not, a dependable Revenue stream will not come on line until the 4th quarter of 2017 so 2018 budget will be up in the air, not quite sure what they will have. By 2019 budget all will be well.
    August 04, 2016, 09:27:17 PM
  • Valor7: You mean that tax that the Commissioners would not put on the ballot for so many years? Strange things happened when the citizens got a chance to vote on that issue.
    August 03, 2016, 06:43:06 PM
  • Lepard LLC: Back up is now available withe the new tax..
    August 03, 2016, 05:01:35 PM
  • Valor7: Thanks a lot Ladies!!
    July 29, 2016, 01:16:13 PM
  • littlebit: ((*(*&
    July 27, 2016, 03:47:52 PM
  • ~kathy~: lol
    July 15, 2016, 09:34:56 AM
  • Valor7: A guy could get killed around here while waiting for backup!
    July 13, 2016, 07:31:58 PM
  • Lepard LLC: You are not alone..
    July 13, 2016, 07:28:53 PM
  • Valor7: I just hate it when I talk to myself!!!!
    July 08, 2016, 12:54:09 PM
  • Valor7: I could have worded that better, we talked details, options, the pros and cons of each, in  order to arrive at the best ballot language to present to the voters. Hope that makes this clearer.
    April 15, 2016, 06:36:14 PM
  • Valor7: sorry about the typos still working with just one arm in action
    April 13, 2016, 01:10:42 PM
  • Valor7: Yes and no. We talked details and options until we were blue in the face but I never heardbring it over, it was always the time was not right for the issue to pass. Glad to see the time in now right and I for one shall vote yes on the ballot. I would urge all others to do the sameour county is busting at the seams crimewise and no matter how many bad guys we send off there always seems to someone to replace them. The Sheriff's Office needs the help.
    April 13, 2016, 01:08:35 PM
  • Lepard LLC: Is that true Valor? Did he ask you what you wanted?
    March 01, 2016, 04:55:37 AM
  • Lepard LLC: Gene Newkirk Rick I have waited for a Sheriff to bring it to me on what he wanted. I have pushed Mr long for a while to get it to me. He told me he was close to having or done. Now hopefully the people will get to decide on it. I spoke with Steve about this a few times.
    March 01, 2016, 04:54:54 AM
  • Kimberly: Wow- I have a new name..........
    February 23, 2016, 10:25:15 PM
  • Lepard LLC: Works on mine, improvements are being done here. I may kick back into her a lot and post but working on different technologies right now. Seeing how things interact.
    January 18, 2016, 09:01:20 AM
  • Valor7: Yes it is working. If you need a laugh the wife showed me how to correctly use the silly thing.
    January 04, 2016, 05:32:59 PM
  • Valor7: Think so, mine is trying to work but it is now user and password protected and I dont know mine
    December 17, 2015, 01:32:16 PM
  • "DJ": Is there still a working android app for the PCSD
    December 14, 2015, 08:14:53 PM

Author Topic: john edwards  (Read 8456 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline fish

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 8885
  • Karma: +349278/-349867
    • View Profile
john edwards
« on: August 07, 2008, 01:39:45 AM »

Share/Bookmark

Fort Wood Hotel

Boards

Devils Elbow

Attractions

Sports

St. Robert

Waynesville

PC Daily

Dixon

Menu Guide

Fun Links

Homework

Crocker

Fort Wood

Swedeborg

Big Piney

Laquey

Classifieds

Restaurants

Richland

Fort  Hotels

This story broke a few days ago. I didn't see it anywhere in the msm. Now I don't put the National Enquirer in the same league as legitimate newspapers, but the story is being reported on the drudge report,freerepublic.com,and assorted daily newspapers. If the story is false why issn't trial lawyer edwards filing a law suit?
 
Sen John Edwards caught with mistress and love child
National Inquirer ^

Posted on Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:17:17 PM by Conservababe
SEN. JOHN EDWARDS CAUGHT WITH MISTRESS AND LOVE CHILD! Vice Presidential candidate Sen. John Edwards was caught visiting his mistress and secret love child at 2:40 this morning in a Los Angeles hotel by the NATIONAL ENQUIRER.  The married ex-senator from North Carolina - whose wife Elizabeth continues to battle cancer -- met with his mistress, blonde divorcée Rielle Hunter, at the Beverly Hilton on Monday night, July 21 - and the NATIONAL ENQUIRER was there! He didn't leave until early the next morning.  Rielle had driven to Los Angeles from Santa Barbara with a male friend for the rendezvous with Edwards. The former senator attended a press event Monday afternoon with L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa on the topic of how to combat homelessness.  But a months-long NATIONAL ENQUIRER investigation had yielded information that Rielle and Edwards, 54, had arranged to secretly meet afterward and for the ex-senator to spend some time with both his mistress and the love child who he refuses to publicly acknowledge as his own.  The NATIONAL ENQUIRER broke the story of Edwards' love child scandal last year, when Rielle was still pregnant and Edwards was still considered a strong candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination.  Both parties denied the NATIONAL ENQUIRER report and a close friend of Edwards' came forward and said he was the father of Rielle's baby. But sources told the NATIONAL ENQUIRER a far different story - they revealed that Edwards was engineering a massive cover up of his shocking infidelity.  Sources came forward after that story appeared and told The NATIONAL ENQUIRER that Edwards and Rielle had met secretly several times, so that he could see his baby and continue his relationship with Rielle.  The NATIONAL ENQUIRER learned ahead of time that one such meeting was set for yesterday.  At 9:45 p.m. (PST) Monday, Edwards appeared at the hotel, and was dropped off at a side entrance. NATIONAL ENQUIRER reporter Alan Butterfield witnessed the ex-senator get out of a BMW driven by a male companion and stroll into the hotel.  Said Butterfield: "Edwards was not carrying anything. He walked in alone. He was wearing a blue dress shirt with the sleeves rolled up. He was looking around nervously before he entered the hotel.  "Once inside, he interestingly bypassed the lobby and ducked down a side stairs to go to the bottom floor to catch the elevator up - rather than taking the elevator in the main lobby. He went out of his way not to be seen."  Meanwhile, Rielle had reserved rooms 246 and 252 under the name of the friend who had accompanied her from Santa Barbara, Bob McGovern. Rielle was in one room and McGovern was in another with her baby. This allowed her and Edwards to spend time alone, a source revealed.  Edwards went out of the hotel briefly with Rielle, they were observed by the NATIONAL ENQUIRER and then went back to her room, where he stayed until attempting to sneak out of the hotel unseen at 2:40 a.m. (PST). But when he emerged alone from an elevator into the hotel basement he was greeted by several reporters from the NATIONAL ENQUIRER.  Senior NATIONAL ENQUIRER Reporter Alexander Hitchen asked Edwards why he was visiting Rielle and whether he was ready to confirm that he was the father of her baby.  Shocked to see a reporter, and without saying anything, Edwards ran up the stairs leading from the hotel basement to the lobby. But, spotting a photographer, he doubled back into the basement. As he emerged from the stairwell, reporter Butterfield questioned him about his hookup with Rielle.  Edwards did not answer and then ran into a nearby restroom. He stayed inside for about 15 minutes, refusing to answer questions from the NATIONAL ENQUIRER about what he was doing in the hotel. A group of hotel security men eventually escorted him from the men's room, while preventing the NATIONAL ENQUIRER reporters from following him out of the hotel.  Said reporter Hitchen: "After we confronted him about seeing Rielle, Edwards looked like a deer caught in headlights!  "He was clearly surprised that we had caught him at this very late hour inside the hotel.  "Some guests up at this late hour watched the spectacle in amusement from a staircase nearby."  Meanwhile, Rielle's friend McGovern also refused to answer any questions from the NATIONAL ENQUIRER or offer any explanation for her meeting with Edwards.  The Edwards "love child" scandal drew international press attention after the NATIONAL ENQUIRER published a blockbuster investigation about the politician in our Dec. 31, 2007 print edition.  We reported that Rielle, a woman linked to Edwards in a cheating scandal earlier last year, was more than six months pregnant - and we reported that she told a close confidante that Edwards was the father of her baby!  Edwards denied the affair and that he was the father, and in a bizarre twist, a close friend of his, Andrew Young, said he was the father. Young, 41, was married at the time with three children. The NATIONAL ENQUIRER has learned he still is married.  Sources told the NATIONAL ENQUIRER exclusively that Edwards had engineered a massive cover up of the affair and love child scandal and that Young was taking the blame for his good friend. At the time Rielle had been relocated from the New York area to Chapel Hill in Edwards' home state of North Carolina, where she was living in an upscale gated community down the street from Young. Strangely, Young even had Rielle to his house for dinner with his wife and kids, the NATIONAL ENQUIRER has learned.  Young has been extremely close to Edwards for years and was a key official in his presidential campaign.  Rielle is a self-described filmmaker whose company was hired by a pro-Edwards group called One America Committee. She was paid $114,000 to produce videos for Edwards' campaign and worked with him on those videos.  After our story last December, reporters from other media outlets asked Edwards about the report during a campaign stop in Columbia, S.C.  Edwards responded: "The story is false. It's completely untrue, ridiculous," adding: "Anyone who knows me knows that I have been in love with the same woman for 30-plus years."  Rielle issued her own statement, saying in part: "The innuendos and lies that have appeared on the Internet and in the NATIONAL ENQUIRER concerning John Edwards are not true, completely unfounded and ridiculous."  But a source told the NATIONAL ENQUIRER: "Now that it seems to have blown wide open, Rielle may get her wish - all she wants is for John to marry her and for them to live happily ever after with their baby. She's tired of running and living a lie."  A representative for Rielle had no comment on last night's meeting with Edwards.

Offline Pete

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 1505
  • Karma: +90258/-1279
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2008, 03:14:40 PM »
If the story is false why issn't trial lawyer edwards filing a law suit?

 (((((
You answered your own question. His political ambitions are over I would think. I feel for his sick wife.
If your going to be dumb, you better be tough!

Offline What_The?

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 2787
  • Karma: +916590/-9868
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2008, 04:15:20 PM »
He's just following the Newt Gingrich road to success.  While your wife is battling cancer, divorce her and knock up your mistress.
"There are plenty of good reasons for fighting, but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God almighty Himself hates with you, too. Where's evil? It's that large part of every man that wants to hate without limit, that wants to hate with God on its side." - Kurt Vonnegut

Offline fish

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 8885
  • Karma: +349278/-349867
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2008, 01:03:35 AM »
that's a good excuse then what the?

Offline blissfullybusy

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 1661
  • Karma: +885922/-1361
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2008, 03:17:08 AM »
ummmm...National enquirer is the source, so I have hard time lending this any credibility.
Women are Angels

And when someone breaks our wings....

We simply continue to fly.........on a broomstick...

Because we are flexible like that

darrellmaurina

  • Guest
Re: john edwards
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2008, 12:24:34 AM »
I hope these are better sources:

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jT9FAYyMpbv_imQT8mFYveeOfdCAD92ED75O0

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/08/us/politics/08text-edwards.html

http://weblog.signonsandiego.com/weblogs/afb/archives/026266.html

The New York Times item is the text of Sen. Edwards' admission and apology. The Associated Press article is an analysis of why reporters didn't go with a story they suspected but couldn't prove to be true. The San Diego Union Tribune blog entry asks why the New York Times ran a story on Sen. McCain with very little proof linking him to an attractive female lobbyist but it took the National Enquirer to expose a sex scandal by a Democrat.

Before people jump all over the "liberal news media," listen to me as a reporter with 18 years of experience and a number of awards for news writing and investigative reporting. Read the Associated Press item carefully. Anyone who knows me knows I go after stories involving breaches of trust by public officials like a pit bull goes after a hunk of red meat. However, there are several cases right now in Pulaski County that have been brought to me but for which I am not convinced I have adequate proof with which to go to press.

At least not yet.

Sometimes the facts just don't show up for a while. And the National Enquirer, by such tactics as paying sources for news, can get things by tactics most reporters consider fundamentally unethical.

People sometimes jump all over me for supposed "negative reporting." But look how close we came to having a Democratic nominee who is an admitted adulterer in an act just two years ago, and then lied about it. Without the news media, really, really awful things happen. That's why we have freedom of the press in this country, and not government-controlled media that carry only what the government wants to let the people read or watch.

Regards,
Darrell Todd Maurina

Offline okie the thread killer

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 4857
  • Karma: +2619917/-766
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #6 on: August 09, 2008, 12:30:28 AM »
So they only get to lie AFTER they're elected?
I have it on good authority that the Hokey-Pokey really IS what it's all about.

Offline fish

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 8885
  • Karma: +349278/-349867
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2008, 01:32:13 AM »
Finally he comes clean with the msm covering the story. The problem is that this type of behavior is a resume enhancer for the dems. It didn't hurt bubba or jesse.
 
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=5544983&page=1

Offline blissfullybusy

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 1661
  • Karma: +885922/-1361
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #8 on: August 09, 2008, 02:34:34 AM »
I'm so disappointed by this. *shaking head*
Women are Angels

And when someone breaks our wings....

We simply continue to fly.........on a broomstick...

Because we are flexible like that

Offline Yankee Trader

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 2028
  • Karma: +470557/-165
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #9 on: August 09, 2008, 02:28:24 PM »
Don't forget CNN as a source!  All over there today.

Offline What_The?

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 2787
  • Karma: +916590/-9868
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #10 on: August 09, 2008, 08:22:52 PM »
that's a good excuse then what the?

That's funny coming from the guy who pusghed for Newt for President.

Apparently your hypocrisy only goes so far, huh?

If a Republican does it, make him president.

If a Democrat does it, he's an immoral sinner who can't be trusted.
"There are plenty of good reasons for fighting, but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God almighty Himself hates with you, too. Where's evil? It's that large part of every man that wants to hate without limit, that wants to hate with God on its side." - Kurt Vonnegut

Offline matrsnot

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 7612
  • Karma: +489606/-6227
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #11 on: August 09, 2008, 08:30:11 PM »
 :) I have yet to see a democrat that can be trusted in my lifetime

Offline fish

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 8885
  • Karma: +349278/-349867
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #12 on: August 09, 2008, 09:30:38 PM »
newt came clean and didn't deny it. but he is the one that has to answer for it. I would have supported newt for office despite his personal failings(we all have them).
edwards tried to hide it and still would not come clean until the newspapers picked it up. I would not support edwards for any political office for other reasons than what was recently revealed.
 
but the gop did not come to newts defense and try to lessen the impact as the dems are doing now.
 
it isn't hypocritical, we are stuck with who we have to choose to vote for.

Offline prE4chEr

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 2811
  • Karma: +257500/-11759
  • Gender: Male
  • Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #13 on: August 10, 2008, 09:21:19 AM »
Many great leaders have had morally questionable sex lives. It doesn't make them any less of a good leader. Martin Luther King Jr., Thomas Jefferson, John F Kennedy have all had morally questionable sex lives, however, they will always be remembered more for their contributions than their shortcomings. I believe a persons sexual life is private, even a politicians. The only exception to this is when their sexual lives drastically differ from the priniciples they are respresenting [Elliot Spitzer, ted haggard, and maybe Larry Craig (it's iffy, but still kinda creepy)]. Then they are free game. As to John Edwards, its kind of an iffy situation. I can't really condemn you for your concern because he does kind of present himself as the family man; but on the other hand, does cheating necessarily make him less of a family man. One can be a good father and husband and cheat, right? Maybe not. It's a pretty tough argument to attempt, and I am not really inclined to make it. I do know that it doesn't make him any less of an ok leader. Notice I said ok. He is far from great.
 
 
P.S. Is John McCain a bad candidate for having an affair on his first wife? I don't think it makes him any less qualified to be our president. I just wanted to make sure you know that McCain has been there and done that.
(\__/)
(o.O )
(> < )  Look into my evil eye. Bunny needs brains.....BRAINS!!!


"All that we see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream" Edgar Allan Poe

Offline prE4chEr

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 2811
  • Karma: +257500/-11759
  • Gender: Male
  • Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #14 on: August 10, 2008, 10:04:12 AM »
As for Newt Gingrich, he is on a whole different level. He cheated on two wives. He may have also refused to pay alimony and child support to his first wife. I got it from wikipedia, so I am not so sure on that one. I will look it up tonight at work. I am at work now, but I got some work to do before I go home. So I really don't have the time to fact check.
(\__/)
(o.O )
(> < )  Look into my evil eye. Bunny needs brains.....BRAINS!!!


"All that we see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream" Edgar Allan Poe

Offline What_The?

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 2787
  • Karma: +916590/-9868
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #15 on: August 10, 2008, 03:40:16 PM »
What Republicans do isn't anyone's business.

When a Democrat does it, it is because he is evil, hates America and wants to tax and spend while taking your guns.
"There are plenty of good reasons for fighting, but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God almighty Himself hates with you, too. Where's evil? It's that large part of every man that wants to hate without limit, that wants to hate with God on its side." - Kurt Vonnegut

Offline Eeyore

  • "Never leave your partner behind"
  • Administrator
  • ***************
  • Posts: 10107
  • Karma: +2940215/-0
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #16 on: August 10, 2008, 03:41:56 PM »
For those in the other thread that were tired of hearing about Obama -- amazing the break this has provided them.
    "Hey, hey, hey, hey now.  Don't be mean.  We don't have to be mean. because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are."      - The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai across The Eighth Dimension

Offline fish

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 8885
  • Karma: +349278/-349867
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #17 on: August 10, 2008, 03:46:42 PM »
hey what the, you are finally coming around.lol lol lol
 
I don't really care what bubba did, but he did it in the oval office. that disgraces OUR house. he also lied which led him to be impeached.
 
we all have our failings and so we are stuck with who to vote for. I vote for a person for political reasons.

Offline Princess04

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 1096
  • Karma: +970329/-239
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #18 on: August 10, 2008, 04:58:15 PM »
Heard on news today that he was all for a DNA test but the lady he had affair with wouldn't do one...why would that be?
"Always follow your dreams...except for the ones when your naked in public"

Offline fknarmyguyretired

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 770
  • Karma: +103698/-268
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #19 on: August 10, 2008, 05:56:42 PM »
probabally part of her payoff conditions
 
Heard on news today that he was all for a DNA test but the lady he had affair with wouldn't do one...why would that be?

Offline prE4chEr

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 2811
  • Karma: +257500/-11759
  • Gender: Male
  • Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #20 on: August 11, 2008, 05:46:32 AM »
Yep. The Newt Gingrich stuff is true. He cheated a bunch of times, and refused to pay his child support. He even approached his first wife while she was in recovery from a uterine cancer surgery to discuss divorce details. Newt Gingrich is a horrible man. Here is a reputable source.
 
http://www.salon.com/news/1998/08/28news.html
(\__/)
(o.O )
(> < )  Look into my evil eye. Bunny needs brains.....BRAINS!!!


"All that we see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream" Edgar Allan Poe

Offline igahmah at work

  • Global Moderator
  • **************
  • Posts: 4826
  • Karma: +941828/-110604
  • Gender: Female
  • Some pursue happiness, others create it!
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #21 on: August 11, 2008, 03:11:21 PM »
I believe most of our presidents have cheated on their wives, Jimmy Carter the exception.  He only "lusted" in his heart.  Back in the days, before instant news and e-mails, we just didn't hear about it until they were dead.  For instance everyone knew Ike had a girlfriend, but the public didn't hear about it till he was dead, FDR, not till he was dead, JFK not till he was dead, kinda makes you wonder why we didn't hear about these things when they were still alive to dispute it.  It is kinda "old news" now when we hear something like that , we are so used to it, but.....
 
I pray that we could get the morals of this country straightened out so that if and when our president has an affair we are shocked by it.
When I was young, I wanted to be older.  This is not what I expected!

Offline Coyote

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 7335
  • Karma: +1304173/-9201
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #22 on: August 11, 2008, 04:38:22 PM »
They may be sleezy, but by golly they sure can find the dirt. 
 
ummmm...National enquirer is the source, so I have hard time lending this any credibility.
....and that night as the moon crossed the mountain, one more Coyote was heard...

Offline fish

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 8885
  • Karma: +349278/-349867
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #23 on: August 12, 2008, 02:50:43 AM »
That is why I really liked Ronald Reagan. he was a respectable man.
 
The hillary camp is saying she would have won the nomination if the edwards deal wasn't kept quiet.

Offline prE4chEr

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 2811
  • Karma: +257500/-11759
  • Gender: Male
  • Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #24 on: August 12, 2008, 05:02:06 AM »
John Edwards IS a liberal, so maybe he and his wife have a liberal sex life. Maybe they are swingers. Maybe she is fine with him having sex with other women when he is "on the road". It isn't really unheard of. Would your opinion of the situation change if his wife gave him her approval before the affair started? Just kind of curious.
(\__/)
(o.O )
(> < )  Look into my evil eye. Bunny needs brains.....BRAINS!!!


"All that we see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream" Edgar Allan Poe

Offline igahmah at work

  • Global Moderator
  • **************
  • Posts: 4826
  • Karma: +941828/-110604
  • Gender: Female
  • Some pursue happiness, others create it!
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #25 on: August 12, 2008, 03:23:11 PM »
You are ridiculous.
 
 
When I was young, I wanted to be older.  This is not what I expected!

Offline Coyote

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 7335
  • Karma: +1304173/-9201
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #26 on: August 12, 2008, 04:13:50 PM »
 (((((
....and that night as the moon crossed the mountain, one more Coyote was heard...

Offline prE4chEr

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 2811
  • Karma: +257500/-11759
  • Gender: Male
  • Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #27 on: August 13, 2008, 05:30:30 AM »
It was just a hypothetical question. There is no reason to be rude.
(\__/)
(o.O )
(> < )  Look into my evil eye. Bunny needs brains.....BRAINS!!!


"All that we see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream" Edgar Allan Poe

shadylane

  • Guest
Re: john edwards
« Reply #28 on: August 14, 2008, 01:11:19 PM »
That is why I really liked Ronald Reagan. he was a respectable man.
 
The hillary camp is saying she would have won the nomination if the edwards deal wasn't kept quiet.

Maybe Edwards should abandon his wife and family like Reagan and Mccain did. The word hypocrite is a very strong word, but it is apropriat for this occation.

Offline fish

  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 8885
  • Karma: +349278/-349867
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards
« Reply #29 on: August 16, 2008, 01:45:10 AM »
they divorced, not abandoned shady