Shoutbox

Refresh History
  • littlebit: Makes sense.
    July 16, 2017, 04:40:28 AM
  • Lepard LLC: Boards will stay open for a place people can find history information longer. I am not allowing anyone to sign up for now because of so many foreginers just wanting to promote their business..
    December 10, 2016, 05:10:27 AM
  • Lepard LLC: Not sure why didn't look, I may be shutting down these message boards..
    November 17, 2016, 12:42:43 AM
  • ~kathy~: rick why is the timestamp showing up a day in advance?
    September 13, 2016, 12:27:46 AM
  • Valor7: What I tried to say is that the actual money would not be there that quick. But a loan against that would work if they are willing to do that.
    August 08, 2016, 01:51:51 PM
  • Lepard LLC: Why so long before it comes online? 911 took out a loan or bond with the known guarantee payment and began building..
    August 08, 2016, 07:46:34 AM
  • Valor7: Actually no it is not, a dependable Revenue stream will not come on line until the 4th quarter of 2017 so 2018 budget will be up in the air, not quite sure what they will have. By 2019 budget all will be well.
    August 04, 2016, 09:27:17 PM
  • Valor7: You mean that tax that the Commissioners would not put on the ballot for so many years? Strange things happened when the citizens got a chance to vote on that issue.
    August 03, 2016, 06:43:06 PM
  • Lepard LLC: Back up is now available withe the new tax..
    August 03, 2016, 05:01:35 PM
  • Valor7: Thanks a lot Ladies!!
    July 29, 2016, 01:16:13 PM
  • littlebit: ((*(*&
    July 27, 2016, 03:47:52 PM
  • ~kathy~: lol
    July 15, 2016, 09:34:56 AM
  • Valor7: A guy could get killed around here while waiting for backup!
    July 13, 2016, 07:31:58 PM
  • Lepard LLC: You are not alone..
    July 13, 2016, 07:28:53 PM
  • Valor7: I just hate it when I talk to myself!!!!
    July 08, 2016, 12:54:09 PM
  • Valor7: I could have worded that better, we talked details, options, the pros and cons of each, in  order to arrive at the best ballot language to present to the voters. Hope that makes this clearer.
    April 15, 2016, 06:36:14 PM
  • Valor7: sorry about the typos still working with just one arm in action
    April 13, 2016, 01:10:42 PM
  • Valor7: Yes and no. We talked details and options until we were blue in the face but I never heardbring it over, it was always the time was not right for the issue to pass. Glad to see the time in now right and I for one shall vote yes on the ballot. I would urge all others to do the sameour county is busting at the seams crimewise and no matter how many bad guys we send off there always seems to someone to replace them. The Sheriff's Office needs the help.
    April 13, 2016, 01:08:35 PM
  • Lepard LLC: Is that true Valor? Did he ask you what you wanted?
    March 01, 2016, 04:55:37 AM
  • Lepard LLC: Gene Newkirk Rick I have waited for a Sheriff to bring it to me on what he wanted. I have pushed Mr long for a while to get it to me. He told me he was close to having or done. Now hopefully the people will get to decide on it. I spoke with Steve about this a few times.
    March 01, 2016, 04:54:54 AM
  • Kimberly: Wow- I have a new name..........
    February 23, 2016, 10:25:15 PM
  • Lepard LLC: Works on mine, improvements are being done here. I may kick back into her a lot and post but working on different technologies right now. Seeing how things interact.
    January 18, 2016, 09:01:20 AM
  • Valor7: Yes it is working. If you need a laugh the wife showed me how to correctly use the silly thing.
    January 04, 2016, 05:32:59 PM
  • Valor7: Think so, mine is trying to work but it is now user and password protected and I dont know mine
    December 17, 2015, 01:32:16 PM
  • "DJ": Is there still a working android app for the PCSD
    December 14, 2015, 08:14:53 PM

Author Topic: Stimulus funding for broadband questioned??  (Read 864 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LarryG

  • 4 gold stars
  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 137
  • Karma: +4380/-2114
  • Gender: Male
  • Go to your profile and put something here.
    • View Profile
Stimulus funding for broadband questioned??
« on: September 21, 2009, 10:26:52 PM »

Share/Bookmark

Fort Wood Hotel

Boards

Devils Elbow

Attractions

Sports

St. Robert

Waynesville

PC Daily

Dixon

Menu Guide

Fun Links

Homework

Crocker

Fort Wood

Swedeborg

Big Piney

Laquey

Classifieds

Restaurants

Richland

Fort  Hotels

Stimulus funding for broadband questioned Group's map shows possible duplication of current cable lines. Chad Livengood News-Leader September 21, 2009       
 
Missouri's telecommunications industry and some Republican state senators are raising questions about Gov. Jay Nixon's plans to expand broadband Internet access to rural parts of the state.  In mid-August, Nixon endorsed a proposal by Marshfield-based Sho-Me Power to apply for $142.3 million in federal stimulus money to lay 2,500 miles of new fiber-optic cable and build 200 new wireless towers to improve access.
But the plan aims to address what's known as the "middle mile" in broadband networks.
That's the infrastructure pipeline for delivering Internet access, but not the connection to people's homes and businesses, which is known as the "last mile."
If approved, Nixon has pledged to kick in $25.2 million in matching state funds already appropriated by the legislature for this purpose. Sho-Me Power has pledged to invest $8.375 million in the project through its broadband fiber company, Sho-Me Technologies.
"Missouri already has a very robust rural broadband network," said Ric Telthorst, president of the Missouri Telecommunications Industry Association.
Telthorst testified Wednesday before a joint House and Senate committee charged with overseeing stimulus spending.
He displayed a map of the state with red lines zig-zagging to towns big and small to represent where existing fiber-optic cable approximately is located. Many of the lines ran along paths Sho-Me Power proposes to lay new cable, primarily paid for by federal tax dollars.
Telthorst said his association fears Sho-Me may duplicate current fiber routes, creating a new network of taxpayer-subsidized competition for the state's existing broadband companies.
"As I look at this, we're building more 'middle mile,' " Sen. Brad Lager, R-Savannah, said. "I think we're completely abdicating building the 'last mile.'"
Lager said he would prefer to see the state spend a few million dollars to first study whether Missouri needs more "middle mile" or "last mile" fiber cable to improve Internet connections in rural communities.
"If we don't have a comprehensive plan going forward, I'm fighting any funding (request) every step of the way," said Lager, who represents a rural 16-county district in northwest Missouri.
For proprietary reasons, the telecom industry's map did not include AT&T's 11,000 miles of fiber, Telthorst said.
Telthorst followed testimony by Paul Wilson, director of the Transform Missouri Project -- an arm of the governor's office coordinating stimulus projects in the state.
"The goal is to make a transformative impact in the number of people with access to affordable high-speed Internet," Wilson told the committee.
During the hearing, Wilson could not immediately answer Lager's question about what the federal government deems an "affordable" price per month for Internet access.
Missouri is competing for a share of the $7 billion appropriated by Congress for expanding high-speed Internet access in the $787 billion stimulus bill, Wilson said.
Wilson said the state received 66 applications for the broadband initiative. Sho-Me Technologies was picked, in part, because of its existing network in southwest Missouri, Wilson said.
The company also offered 12 of every 60 strands of fiber in every new cable laid for state use to communicate among schools, prisons, state offices and law enforcement agencies.
Wilson said every county seat would have high-speed Internet access under the governor's plan, which would expand the percentage of Missourians with access to broadband from 79.7 percent to 91.5 percent.
"It would be a huge step forward for the state," he said.
Under the proposal, state government also would have access to 25 percent of the tower space. Having exclusive rights to the fiber-optic cable and towers could save the state millions of dollars each year that is spent renting broadband access, Wilson said.
The federal government likely will award the broadband grants sometime after late November, Wilson said.
Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Glendale, expressed concern that the state would be infringing on the private marketplace.
Wilson said the Nixon administration has no intention of getting into the high-speed Internet business, but the telecommunications industry isn't so sure.
"Using a state network to undercut private carriers or subsidize the operations of particular carriers would only reduce the incentive that the private sector has to continue to deploy broadband," Telthorst told the committee. "And it could result in the loss of private sector jobs. That's just not the way public funds ought to be spent."
http://www.news-leader.com/article/20090921/NEWS06/909210347/1007/NEWS01/Stimulus-funding-for-broadband-questioned

Offline Geezer Glide Taz

  • Land Of The Free, Because Of The Brave
  • Registered User
  • ******************
  • Posts: 3077
  • Karma: +1004673/-68
  • Gender: Male
  • Riding Vertical Shiny Side Up
    • View Profile
Re: Stimulus funding for broadband questioned??
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2009, 04:29:28 PM »
I have no problems with it.I know too many people who live just out side of twons that can only get dial up still. Expanding good internet capabilities will help small rural businesses, help elderly connect. The internet is an important means of communications and if this help create a better system in Missouri I am all for it. Not to mention the jobs it will create building all this.
Freedom Of Road Riders,
Protecting and informing riders in Missouri
www.midamericafreedomrally.com

Please watch out for Motorcycles on the road
The life you save might be mine